Online Discussion 2 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Online Discussion 2 - Essay Exampley procedure describes the expectation of philology learners to have simple languages so that they can easy apply their comprehension in writings (Shemshadsara, 2012). To that effect, the tutors compromise the standards of language technique in order to impress the learners. It shows teachers as being discriminating in developing their teaching programs instead of maintaining the prescribed schedule to develop critical and analytical skills in students (Cameron, 2001).The objective of the article is to first articulate the fact that linguistics is a challenging field of study. Secondly, it aims at developing constructive perception of teachers and students with regards to linguistics in order to develop skills that challenge the community beyond the classroom environment (Fairclough, 1995). This article demonstrates an perceptiveness of the needs of sequential stages of learning, and suggests a low level proficiency requirement for elementary cla sses. The ultimate aim of the article is to trigger a paradigm shift for twain the students and learners about languages by providing solution to the emerging challenges.The article addresses different categories of audience, with a variety of reasons. First, it exposes the attitude with which teachers crystallize their duties. It focuses on pointing to teachers their real experiences in teaching with the hope that they can improve on their attitudes. The second stern group is students. It focuses on developing a sense of proactive participation of students in the acquisition of linguistics and literature skills. The third target group is that of the authors of various literatures. It recommends the use of simplified languages for the low level literature and linguistics classes to develop relevant skills in a progressive manner.The strengths of the article is evident in its understanding of the linguistics and literature challenges. In the introductory section, Cots (2006) descr ibes the tasks as problematic. Secondly, it